خلفائے راشدین کے دور میں حدودِ شراب، زنا اور قذف کی پالیسیاں اور معاصر فقہاء کی تعبیرات: تقابلی جائزہ

Authors

  • Dr Muhammad Imran Assistant Professor,University of Kotli Azad Jammu And Kashmir,Department of Islamic Studies. Author
  • Muhammad Amar PhD scholar, Department of Islamic Studies,Lahore Leads University,Lecturer, Lahore Leads University. Author
  • Bushra Taj PhD Scholar, Department of Islamic studies,Lahore Leads University, Teacher at Lahore Grammar School, Samanabad Branch. Author

Keywords:

Rightly Guided Caliphs, Alcohol, Adultery, Slander (Qazf), Contemporary Jurists, Ijtihad, Hudood, Social Impacts, Judicial Implementation, Comparative Analysis

Abstract

This research article provides a detailed analysis of the punishments for alcohol consumption, adultery,
and slander (Qazf) during the era of the Rightly Guided Caliphs and examines them in a comparative framework
with the interpretations and ijtihad of contemporary Islamic jurists. During the period of the Rightly Guided
Caliphs, the limits prescribed by Shariah were not only clear and strict but were also intended to ensure social
discipline, moral training, judicial transparency, and the protection of human dignity. The prohibition of alcohol,
the punishments for adultery, and the strict evidentiary requirements in cases of slander formed the foundation of
judicial and social policies of that era. Their enforcement promoted fear of God, justice, and moral upbringing in
society.The study also highlights that contemporary jurists, while preserving the spirit of classical limits, have
provided ijtihadi interpretations suitable for addressing complex social, legal, and ethical issues of the present
era. Modern scholars suggest that in the implementation of punishments for alcohol, adultery, and slander,
flexibility, consideration of social conditions, and respect for human rights should be taken into account. In this
way, Islamic limits can be harmonized with contemporary judicial systems, international laws, and human rights
standards, ensuring justice, morality, and peace in society.The comparative analysis of classical policies and
contemporary jurisprudence indicates that while the principled stability of Islamic law is maintained, practical
implementation is possible through ijtihad. This review also shows that Shariah is not merely a legal code but a
practical and flexible system that promotes social balance, moral development, and judicial justice. Furthermore,
ijtihadi interpretations have the capacity to implement Islamic limits effectively, ethically, and practically in
accordance with contemporary global challenges, international laws, and social circumstances.This study
critically examines historical and contemporary jurisprudential sources, including Hadith, Quranic verses,
classical fatwas, and modern fiqh literature, providing an academic foundation for understanding how the limits
on alcohol, adultery, and slander in Islamic law remain effective in promoting social justice, judicial transparency,
and ethical conduct across eras.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Islamic Studies